On 4 January 2013 18:07, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Exactly. To my mind, the *entire* point of this patch is to remove the > need for people to try to dig information out of potentially-localized > message strings. It's not clear to me that we have to strain to provide > information that isn't in the currently-reported messages --- we are > only trying to make it easier for client-side code to extract the > information it's likely to need.
It seems that we're in agreement, then. I'll prepare a version of the patch very similar to the one I previously posted, but with some caveats about how reliably the values can be used. I think that that should be fine. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
