On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:10:31AM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 7 January 2013 07:29, Takeshi Yamamuro > <yamamuro.take...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > > Anyway, the compression speed in lz4 is very fast, so in my > > opinion, there is a room to improve the current implementation > > in pg_lzcompress. > > So why don't we use LZ4? > +1
Regards, Ken -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
