On 9 January 2013 16:27, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'm with Magnus. This is seriously annoying, especially when the > "discussion" thread has a title not closely related to the "patch" > emails. (It doesn't help any that the list server doesn't manage to > deliver the emails in order, at least not to me --- more often than > not, they're spread out over a few minutes and interleaved with other > messages.)
I agree. I actually go to some lengths to coordinate all of these threads during review, and I'd prefer not to have to. I would have said something, but it seemed unimportant (relative to the patchset itself). -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
