"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has anyone made a decision about the SET LOCAL needing to be changed to SET > TRANSATION for SQL compatibiltity?
I think we had decided not to; IIRC the argument that spelling it
TRANSACTION would be more spec-compatible looked bogus on closer
inspection.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
