On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:28:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > Claudio, Stephen, > > It really seems like the areas where we could get the most "bang for the > buck" in parallelism would be: > > 1. Parallel sort > 2. Parallel aggregation (for commutative aggregates) > 3. Parallel nested loop join (especially for expression joins, like GIS) > > parallel data load? :/
We have that in pg_restore, and I thinnk we are getting parallel dump in 9.3, right? Unfortunately, I don't see it in the last 9.3 commit-fest. Is it still being worked on? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
