On 01/15/2013 11:32 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:28:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: Claudio, Stephen, It really seems like the areas where we could get the most "bang for the buck" in parallelism would be: 1. Parallel sort 2. Parallel aggregation (for commutative aggregates) 3. Parallel nested loop join (especially for expression joins, like GIS) parallel data load? :/We have that in pg_restore, and I thinnk we are getting parallel dump in 9.3, right? Unfortunately, I don't see it in the last 9.3 commit-fest. Is it still being worked on?
I am about half way through reviewing it. Unfortunately paid work take precedence over unpaid work.
cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
