* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > This seems to provide a reasonably principled > argument why we might want to fix this case with a localized use of an > MVCC scan before we have such a fix globally.
I had discussed that idea a bit with Andres on IRC and my only concern
was if there's some reason that acquiring a snapshot during createdb()
would be problematic. It doesn't appear to currently and I wasn't sure
if there'd be any issues.
I'll start working on a patch for that.
> Not that I wouldn't still want to mark it with a REVERT_ME_SOMEDAY
> kind of annotation. We know we need the SnapshotNow scan fix.
Agreed.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
