Marti Raudsepp <ma...@juffo.org> writes:
> Interestingly, PostgreSQL 9.2 has regressed here. Not sure if we care,
> but worth mentioning:
Regressed? The output looks the same to me as it has for some time.
> test=# select * from foo1;
> (No rows)
> Time: 1012.567 ms
How did you get that? I don't believe it's possible in the default
output format.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
