Andres Freund escribió: > I somewhat dislike the fact that CONCURRENTLY isn't really concurrent > here (for the listeners: swapping the indexes acquires exlusive locks) , > but I don't see any other naming being better.
REINDEX ALMOST CONCURRENTLY? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
