John R Pierce <pie...@hogranch.com> writes: > On 1/23/2013 8:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> FWIW, in Fedora-land I see: ...
> I'd be far more interested in what is in RHEL and CentOS. Fedora, > with its 6 month obsolescence cycle, is of zero interest to me for > deploying database servers. But of course Fedora is also the upstream that will become RHEL7 and beyond. > EL6 has libselinux 2.0.94 > EL5 has libselinux 1.33.4 sepgsql already requires libselinux 2.0.99, so it doesn't appear to me that moving that goalpost is going to change things one way or the other for the existing RHEL branches. I couldn't ship contrib/sepgsql today in those branches. It might be that the update timing makes a bigger difference in some other distros, though. To return to Heikki's original point about Debian, what are they shipping today? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers