Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:48:37AM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: >> FWIW, and I won't annoy anyone further after this email, now that its >> deterministic, I still think that this should be an ERROR not a WARNING.
> As the FREEZE is just an optimization, I thought NOTICE, vs WARNING or > ERROR was fine. If others want this changed, please reply. The previous argument about it was "if you bothered to specify FREEZE, you probably really want/need that behavior". So I can definitely see Andres' point. Perhaps WARNING would be a suitable compromise? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers