On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I think that we'll soon be buried in gripes if they're not. Pretty much > the whole point of this patch is to allow applications to get rid of > ad-hoc, it-usually-works coding techniques. I'd argue that not checking > the entire constraint identity is about as fragile as trying to "sed" > the constraint name out of a potentially-localized error message. > In both cases, it often works fine, until the application's context > changes.
+1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
