Satoshi Nagayasu <sn...@uptime.jp> writes: >> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 07:14 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
> BTW, is there any good place to put new regression test for the psql > command? I couldn't find it out. As far as a test for this specific feature goes, I'd be against adding one, because it'd be likely to result in random failures in "make installcheck" mode, depending on what other databases are in the installation. More generally, we've tended to put tests of \d-style psql features together with the relevant backend-side tests. The proposed patch to add \gset adds a separate regression test file specifically for psql. I've been debating whether that was worth committing; but if there's near-term interest in adding any more tests for psql features that aren't closely connected to backend features, maybe it's worth having such a file. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers