On 2/1/13 8:00 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2013/2/1 Marko Tiikkaja <pgm...@joh.to>: >> On 2/1/13 1:47 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >>> >>> now a most "hard" work is done and I would to enable access to new >>> error fields from plpgsql. >> >> >> Is there a compelling reason why we wouldn't provide these already in 9.3? > > a time for assign to last commitfest is out. > > this patch is relative simple and really close to enhanced error > fields feature - but depends if some from commiters will have a time > for commit to 9.3 - so I am expecting primary target 9.4, but I am not > be angry if it will be commited early.
If we don't have access to those fields on PL/pgSQL, what was the point of the patch to begin with? Surely, accessing them from C wasn't the main use case? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
