On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Tolerate timeline switches while "pg_basebackup -X fetch" is running.
>
> I just noticed that this commit introduced a few error messages that
> have a file argument which is not properly quoted:
>
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode_for_file_access(),
> + errmsg("requested WAL segment %s has already been removed",
> + filename)));
>
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errmsg("could not find WAL file %s", startfname)));
>
> The first one seems to come from e57cd7f0a16, which is pretty old so
> it's a bit strange that no one noticed.
>
> Not sure what to do here ... should we just update everything including
> the back branches, or just leave them alone and touch master only?
-1 from me on any message changes in the back-branches. It's not
worth confusing large parsing software that's already out there, and
it's definitely not worth forcing people to make the regex contingent
on which *minor* version is in use. But +1 for making it consistent
in HEAD.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
