On 1 February 2013 23:56, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Well, if we were tracking the latest value in shared memory, we could
> certainly clamp to that to ensure it didn't go backwards.  The problem
> is where to find storage for a per-DB value.

Adding new data columns to catalogs in backbranches seems like a great
reason to have an hstore column on every catalog table.

That way we can just add anything we need without causing other problems.

Obviously something for the future.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to