2013/2/3 Tom Lane <[email protected]>: > Pavel Stehule <[email protected]> writes: >> now missing variables is replaced by variable's name. We can implement >> some pset option - some like define what do with missing variable > >> \pset missing_variable (use_name | use_null | error ) > > No, it isn't "replaced by variable's name". What actually happens is we > don't attempt a replacement unless the string after the colon matches an > existing variable. Tampering with that seems dangerous and foolish.
some other ideas? do you think so full NULL support has sense? Regards Pavel > > regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
