On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > But even leaving that aside, I'm surprised to hear so many people > dismissing SQL standards compliance so blithely. We've certainly > spent a lot of blood, sweat, and tears on minor standards-compliance > issues over they years - why is it OK to not care about this > particular issue when we've spent so much effort caring about other > ones?
Does the SQL Standard suggest you can't extend the language with operators? Or does it reserve certain characters for future use? And if so, is there a list? merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
