On 2 January 2013 22:51, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I am not sure, but maybe is time to introduce ANSI SQL syntax for >> functions' named parameters >> >> It is defined in ANSI SQL 2011 >> >> CALL P (B => 1, A => 2) >> >> instead PostgreSQL syntax CALL ( B := 1, A := 2) > > Keep in mind that, as recently as PostgreSQL 9.1, we shipped hstore > with a =>(text, text) operator. That operator was deprecated in 9.0, > but it wasn't actually removed until PostgreSQL 9.2. Whenever we do > this, it's going to break things for anyone who hasn't yet upgraded > from hstore v1.0 to hstore v1.1. So I would prefer to wait one more > release. That way, anyone who does an upgrade, say, every other major > release cycle should have a reasonably clean upgrade path.
I don't see why waiting 1 year makes this situation any better. We just make upgrading to hstore 1.1 a prerequisite and we're done. I doubt there are many people using hstore who haven't upgraded, and fewer still that will upgrade yet can't follow simple instructions on prerequisites. While hstore is reasonably popular, users are still in the minority. You can always override the operators using a different search_path if you still see problems there. We need to find ways forwards rather than block progress because of obscure issues. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
