On 06/02/2013 22:25, Josh Berkus wrote:
Mind you, when I explained our current CF review workflow for the SF ReviewFest last year, the attendees thought I was insane. It's kept me from doing more reviewfests. Our current workflow and tooling is definitely a serious obstacle to gettng more reviewers. Seems like a good topic for the developer meeting.
I'm honestly having a hard time believing this. I've never thought of the commitfest workflow as complicated or burdensome. I actually quite like how things are there at the moment.
Besides, if we can't expect people to spend 30 minutes figuring out the workflow, how on earth do we expect them to review patches?
Regards, Marko Tiikkaja -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
