Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > On 2/8/13 12:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Over in Fedora-land they're trying to institute support for ARM64, >> which among other things means autoconf 2.69 or later: >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/178273.html
> What they actually mean is that they need config.guess and config.sub > that is shipped with autoconf 2.69. But the ones in the postgresql > source tree are already of the required version. [ looks... ] Ah, you're right, and it's even true in 9.2 so I won't be needing a patch for that. Excellent, thanks. > The reason I haven't been pushing for autoconf updates in a while is > that the release notes of recent versions consist mostly of "fix > regression in previous release" and no actual features that would be of > use in PostgreSQL's configure script. This should be revisited from > time to time, but it's probably better to do that near the beginning of > a development cycle. Agreed, if there are no features or bugfixes that affect us then there's no particular need to update. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers