On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> The phrasing "as of 8.2" basically means "from 8.2 onwards". Changing the >>> version there would make the text incorrect. > >> In theory we could remove that reference completely since any versions >> where it does not apply are out of support since years ago at this >> point. But I don't see a point in doing that just for the sake of >> removing - but if a section is reworded in general that contains such >> references, it could be dropped. > > The fact that pre-8.2 is out of support doesn't make this useless > information: many such installations are still out there in the wild, > and people may want to know what techniques will work with them. > I'd be inclined to leave the text as-is until it's been awhile since > we've heard of anyone using pre-8.2.
If you are using an earlier version, you should really be reading the documentation that corresponds to the version that you are using. That said, this general reason is why I say we shouldn't go remove it intentionally. I'm just saying it's acceptable "collateral damage" if it gets removed along with another patch, and that we shouldn't put special efforts into maintaining it. I'd rather see that special effort go into encouraging people to read the version of the documentation that matches their version of PostgreSQL... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
