> To be honest, I don't really think thats fair to the patch. I don't see > much that can be made smaller as long as the "one file for all > persistent settings" dogma is upheld which more people seem to vote for > (exluding me).
I'm not a fan of "one file to rule them all" either. Hovever, I'm strongly in favor of anything that can get into 9.3. So if we can make a 9.3 patch out of this by doing "file-per-setting", then I'm all for it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
