Ian Lawrence Barwick <barw...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2013/2/14 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> Can't you pretty much do this already in psql with FETCH_COUNT? I see
>> no good reason to invent more SQL syntax.
> Doesn't that just split up the retrieval of the result set into blocks of
> FETCH_COUNT rows, i.e. does not limit the result set?
Well, you'll get a page worth of data before your pager blocks it,
and then you can continue, or not, for relatively little cost.
I can't see that fetching a fixed number of rows is more useful
than that.
[ experiments... ] Although I notice that psql's FETCH_COUNT logic
doesn't realize that it could be applied to a "TABLE foo" query.
That seems like it might be worth fixing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
