Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Well, I'm not sure about information_schema, but we'll definitely > want a pg_matviews system view.
> That could wait until 9.4, though. That I could probably do. Do you think they should have a separate pg_stat_user_matviews table, etc., or do you think it would be better to include them in with tables there? > Also a \dM. I already added it as \dm in the current patch. Does that conflict with something else that's pending? -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
