Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, the NULL-pointer test might equally well be coded as an Assert:
> You really think it should be Assert?
I don't feel a need to change it, no. I was just pointing out that
there shouldn't be any way for a user to cause that condition to occur.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
