On 2013-02-21 14:23:35 +0000, Albe Laurenz wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Another thing I was wondering about, but did not change, is that if we're > > having the remote transaction inherit the local transaction's isolation > > level, shouldn't it inherit the READ ONLY property as well? > > That seems to me like it would be the right thing to do.
I am not 100% convinced of that. There might be valid usecases where a standby executes queries on the primary that executes that do DML. And there would be no way out of it I think? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers