On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: > > Are you talking about the patch to avoid restored WAL segments from being > re-archived (commit 6f4b8a4f4f7a2d683ff79ab59d3693714b965e3d), or the bug > that that unarchived WALs were deleted after crash (commit > b5ec56f664fa20d80fe752de494ec96362eff520)? The former was included in 9.2.0 > already, and the latter will be included in the next point release. > ... > > I don't know what the release schedule is. I take that to be a request to > put out a new minor release ASAP.
+1 from me. I'm rather uncomfortable running a system with this unarchived deletion bug. Cheers, Jeff -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
