On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote: > It doesn't. That was one of the more contentious points in the > earlier bikeshedding phases. Some felt that throwing away the > contents was a form of making the MV "out of date" and as such > didn't require any special handling. Others, including myself, > felt that "data not present" was a distinct state from "generated > zero rows" and that attempting to scan a materialized view for > which data had not been generated must result in an error. The > latter property has been maintained from the beginning -- or at > least that has been the intent.
Actually this sounds like exactly what I was saying. I withdraw my concern entirely. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
