> That feels completely wrong to me. For one thing, I can't think of > any ALTER commands to populate or remove data. What did you think > of the idea of something like DISCARD MATERIALIZED VIEW DATA as a > new statment? Or maybe RESET MATERIALIZED VIEW?
I prefer RESET, especially since it could eventually support RESET ALL MATERIALIZED VIEWS if that turns out to be useful. How does the parser like that? BTW, to contradict Peter E., for my part I would NOT want matview resets to be logged as DDL. I would only want matview definitition changes to be so logged. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
