On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: > Yeah, I'd guess that it was an oversight. But it goes back all the way to > Postgres95, so it's a bit too late to change that.
I don't see why. We've plugged holes like this before and will do so again in the future, I'm sure. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
