On 01.03.2013 17:37, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
In summary, this seems like a pretty clear win for short values, and
a wash for long values. Not surprising, as this greatly lowers the
startup cost of pglz_compress(). We're past feature freeze, but how
would people feel about committing this?
Surely we're not past feature freeze. If we were, we'd have to reject
all remaining patches from the commitfest, which is not what we want to
do at this stage, is it?
Right, no, that's not what I meant by feature freeze. I don't know what
the correct term here would be, but what I meant is that we're not
considering new features for 9.3 anymore, except those that are in the
commitfest.
My take on this is that if this patch is necessary to get Amit's patch
to a commitable state, it's fair game.
I don't think it's necessary for that, but let's see..
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
