2013/2/27 Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net>: > * Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote: >> I don't agree so it works well - you cannot use short type names is >> significant issue > > This is for psql. In what use-case do you see that being a serious > limitation? > > I might support having psql be able to fall-back to checking if the > function name is unique (or perhaps doing that first before going on to > look at the function arguments) but I don't think this should all be > punted to the backend where only 9.3+ would have any real support for a > capability which already exists in other places and should be trivially > added to these.
a functionality can be same - only error message will be little bit different > > Thanks, > > Stephen -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
