On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Ants Aasma <a...@cybertec.at> wrote: > . To give another example of potential future > update semantics, if we were to allow users manually maintaining > materialized view contents using DML commands, one would expect > TRUNCATE to mean "make this matview empty", not "make this matview > unavailable".
Wouldn't that just be a regular table then though? How is that a materialized view? If anything someone might expect truncate to delete any rows from the source table that appear in the view. But I think it's likely that even if materialized views were updateable truncate wouldn't be one of the updateable operations. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
