Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > More generally, though, I was thinking that the appropriate answer > at this point is to rip out support for version-0 authentication > altogether. I can't believe anyone will be trying to connect to a > 7.3 or beyond server with 6.2 client libraries (v0 went away in 6.3 > as best I can tell from the CVS logs).
Further, has this code actually been tested within recent memory? If not, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it's suffered some bitrot... > Anyone want to argue that we should keep the v0 protocol support any > longer? Nope, exactly the same thought crossed my mind while I was reading through the code... Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
