Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Another point worth considering is that most of this is duplicated by
>> ecpg's libpgtypes.
> Bah, ignore this.
Huh? I think you're quite right that it'd be a good idea to get rid of
the duplicated code, if we could. It's always been the backend's free
reliance on palloc and elog/ereport that's been stopping that. I think
we might now have a realistic solution for palloc, but what about elog?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
