On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> I wasn't complaining that the change isn't instant.  I understand that can't
> be done.  But I think the signal to reload should be sent.  If people
> execute SET PERSISTENT, and it doesn't actually do anything until the server
> is next restarted, they will be very surprised.  It's OK if it doesn't do
> anything for a second, or until new sessions connect, because that's just
> how SIGHUP/session variables work.  That's a documentation issue.  Not
> reloading the config at all, I think that's going to trigger a ton of future
> support problems.

Think also about the case where someone wants to change multiple
values together and having just some set and not others would be
inconsistent.

I can see you're right about surprising users but is there not another
way to solve the same problem without making that impossible?



-- 
greg


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to