On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> writes: >> It feels a bit like unpredictable magic to have "DEFAULT" mean one >> thing and omitted columns mean something else. > > Agreed. The current code behaves that way, but I think that's > indisputably a bug not behavior we want to keep.
I'm not entirely convinced that's a bug. Both behaviors seem useful, and there has to be some way to specify each one. But I just work here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
