On 03/18/2013 12:29 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > One wrinkle in this picture is the variadic forms of extraction which > don't lend themselves nicely to use with an operator. We could decide to > do away with those altogether, or come up with a better name. I'm loath > to use "json_path" since it's a name used for something similar but > different elsewhere. I do think it's valuable to have the variadic form, > though, and I'd be sad to see it go.
Given that the variadic form is meant to be the foundation of future tree-based indexing of JSON values, I really don't want to do without it. Plus, I'd be forced to reimplement it in my own code. But the name does need work. json_tree? Hmmm, no good ... -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers