Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> writes:
> Hadi Moshayedi <h...@moshayedi.net> wrote:
>> I also noticed that this patch makes matview test fail. It seems
>> that it just changes the ordering of rows for queries like
>> "SELECT * FROM tv;". Does this seem like a bug in my patch, or
>> should we add "ORDER BY" clauses to this test to make it more
>> deterministic?
> I added some ORDER BY clauses. That is probably a good thing
> anyway for purposes of code coverage. Does that fix it for you?
Uh, what? Fooling around with the implementation of avg() should surely
not change any planning decisions.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
