On 21 March 2013 17:08, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/3/21 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >> I'm not entirely convinced that this is a good idea, but if we're going >> to allow it I would argue that "array_length(a)" should be defined as >> "array_length(a, 1)". The other possibilities are too complicated to >> explain in as few words. >> > > exactly > > +1
Hi Pavel, Is your +1 to array_length(a) being defined as array_length(a,1), or to Tom's being unconvinced by the whole proposal? Or both? Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
