On Friday, March 22, 2013 8:57 AM Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Amit Kapila escribió: > > On Friday, March 22, 2013 12:48 AM Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > Maybe add some syntax to prevent the SIGHUP for the rare case where > > > that > > > is wanted, say > > > > > > SET PERSISTENT (reload=off) var=val; > > > > > > (perhaps WITH at the end, dunno) > > > > I think adding new syntax change is little scary for me, not for the > matter > > of implementation but for building consensus on syntax. > > I cannot but agree on that point.
Sorry, I don't get your point. Do you mean to say that you don't agree with me and want new syntax as proposed by you to be implemented? With Regards, Amit Kapila. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
