On 03/24/2013 06:06 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us <mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>> wrote:

    Over the weekend, KDE came within a gnat's eyelash of losing *all*
    their authoritative git repos, despite having seemingly-extensive
    redundancy.  Read about it here:
    http://jefferai.org/2013/03/24/too-perfect-a-mirror/

It is really great that KDE people are actually sharing this experience. This is really profitable for other projects as well as individuals.
And thanks for sharing it here.


    We should think about protecting our own repo a bit better, especially
    after the recent unpleasantness with a bogus forced update.  The idea
    of having clones that are deliberately a day or two behind seems
    attractive ...

Just an idea here: why not adding a new subdomain in postgresql.org <http://postgresql.org> for mirrors of the official GIT repository
similar to the buildfarm?
People registered in this service could publish themselves mirrors and decide by themselves the delay their clone keeps with the parent repo. The scripts used by each mirror maintainer (for backup, sync repo with a given delay) could be centralized in a way similar to buildfarm code so as everybody in the community could
use it and publish it if they want.

Also, the mirrors published should be maintained by people that are well-known inside the community, and who would not add extra commits which would make the mirror out-of-sync with the parent repo.

Such an idea is perhaps too much if the point is to maintain 2-3 mirrors of the parent repo, but gives enough transparency to actually know where the mirrors are and what is the sync delay maintained.



This strikes me as being overkill. The sysadmins seem to have it covered.

Back when we used CVS for quite a few years I kept 7 day rolling snapshots of the CVS repo, against just such a difficulty as this. But we seem to be much better organized with infrastructure these days so I haven't done that for a long time.

cheers

andrew


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to