Brendan Jurd <dire...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 25 March 2013 13:02, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> Brendan, how hard would it be to create a GUC for backwards-compatible
>> behavior?
> Good idea.
No, it *isn't* a good idea. GUCs that change application-visible
semantics are dangerous. We should have learned this lesson by now.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
