Brendan Jurd <[email protected]> writes:
> On 25 March 2013 13:02, Josh Berkus <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Brendan, how hard would it be to create a GUC for backwards-compatible
>> behavior?
> Good idea.
No, it *isn't* a good idea. GUCs that change application-visible
semantics are dangerous. We should have learned this lesson by now.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
