On 3/24/13 3:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I also concur with the complaint here > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/caazkufzxyj-rt1aec6s0g7zm68tdlfbbm1r6hgrbbxnz80k...@mail.gmail.com > that allowing a minimum sleep of 0 is rather dangerous
The original "watch" command apparently silently corrects a delay of 0 to 0.1 seconds. > Another minor question is whether we really need the time-of-day in the > banner, That's also part of the original "watch" and occasionally useful, I think. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
