"[email protected]" <[email protected]> writes:
> Tom Lane <[email protected]> schrieb:
>> Yeah, if you can just ignore !indisvalid indexes that should work fine.
>> I see no need to look at indisready if you're doing that.
> You need to look at inisready in 9.2 since thats used for about to be dropped
> indexes. No?
No, he doesn't need to look at indisready/indislive; if either of those
flags are off then indisvalid should certainly be off too. (If it
isn't, queries against the table are already in trouble.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
