Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The only reasonable answer for this (a provably used, non-security, >> non-standards violating, non-gross functionality breakage case) is >> *zero*.
> +1. Well, if we're going to take that hard a line on it, then we can't change anything about array data storage or the existing functions' behavior; which leaves us with either doing nothing at all, or inventing new functions that have saner behavior while leaving the old ones in place. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers