On 9 April 2013 09:24, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > As much as I have a keen interest in this feature, it isn't (AFAIK) > being considered for 9.3. Given that it's generated a fair amount of > controversy, could we table it until 9.3 beta? There's still plenty of > unresolved 9.3 patches in the queue.
No problem. I certainly wasn't expecting it to run for 90 messages when I started out. I'll pipe down for now and resume after the beta. Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
