On 15 April 2013 21:53, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > So I'll treat this as two separate cases: > * add special case for sequences
Patch attached. > * use the NO SQL mechanism, as described, which implies no reads or > writes of database state. We could test that, but its somewhat harder > and we'd need to test for that on entry to any function, which I don't > much like. For another time. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
copy_tuning_with_default_nextval.v1.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
