Dimitri Fontaine escribió: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > You can be as much silent as you want in marketing materials (though > > maybe Berkus will disagree with you about being silent there), but it is > > not admissible to be silent in the documentation or pretend the feature > > is not there. Whatever got committed, however small, needs to be > > properly documented. > > Definitely, yes. > > The only questions in this thread are: > > - only docs or docs + contrib example? > > Tom said it's too late for the contrib example.
So there's already an answer to this question, isn't there. > - what about support for PLs other than C and PLpgSQL? > > It used to be part of the patch, and I don't understand well enough > the development calendar to guess if I'm supposed to extract that > from earlier patch or if that's too late for 9.3. I'm not sure > what Peter's idea are wrt to the calendar here. It seems far too late for more code at this stage. IMO anyway. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
